A post on something random I think us nerds might enjoy. I've been working for a social health nonprofit recently, doing research on how facilitated connection events affect loneliness, isolation, and mental health. I stumbled across this thing in the UK called "social prescribing". Here's the process, summarized by GPT:

Someone identifies a non-medical need
Could be a GP, nurse, pharmacist, hospital discharge team, local authority, charity, job centre, housing association, etc. Self-referral is also often encouraged.
Referral to a link worker (or “connector scheme”)
The link worker spends time with the person, taking a “what matters to you?” approach and looking at the whole picture, not just symptoms.
Co-produce a simple plan (“social prescription”)
This is a personalised set of next steps, matched to interests, constraints, and local options.
Warm connection into community support
Also helping with barriers: confidence, transport, cost, accessibility, paperwork, motivation, follow-through.
Follow-up and adjustment
The link worker checks what’s working, what isn’t, and iterates.

Anybody see a difference from the American healthcare system here? To use AI syntax: this is not just palliative care, it's restorative.

I got curious about what sort of system would create and fund a plan like this. Coincidentally, a friend in the UK government sent me some reports on how they address creation of public policy. It's a beautiful example of how good design can create really functional results, and I thought y'all might enjoy reading about it.

Public Design Case Study Bank

Reflections from the Human-Centred Design Science team, Department for Work and Pensions (DWP)

The TL;DR is that government-funded design teams in the UK do a lot more consideration of both policy implementation, adoption, and effects than I've seen in most other orgs (who often say "this sounds good, let's do it and see what happens!" without thinking about end-user adoption or iteration). The second article above has a great summary: "When interventions don’t achieve policy goals, it’s common to think that the problem lies in the decision-making of end users or staff. However, if we suppose that people behave reasonably within the context afforded to them, why do we create policies and processes that assume they would behave otherwise? Our team zoomed in on what factors drive design decisions, and how could they be improved."

I'm curious what other orgs and institutions you know that do program and policy design and implementation really well?

design thinking

The UK government is great at policy design